By the ninth century, parts of southern Europe began observing first day of the new year on March 25 to coincide with Annunciation Day (the church holiday nine months prior to Christmas celebrating the Angel Gabriel's revelation to the Virgin Mary that she was to be the mother of the Messiah). However, England did not adopt this change in the beginning of the new year until late in the twelfth century.
Because the year began in March, records referring to the "first month" pertain to March; to the second month pertain to April, etc., so that "the 19th of the 12th month" would be February 19.
And the natural question is, what's the difference here? We'll see in a second that that's not exactly right, but that's what the implication is. Even though it's not referring to Christ anymore-- and the intention here is so that it's less religious than the term "Before Christ"-- it's still putting an importance on Christ's birth, because it's saying that the common era is the time period after the birth of Christ, which we'll see in a second isn't exactly right.
If someone writes BCE, they're saying something very different. But the CE, the C in CE does not stand for Christ anymore. But there's essentially the same exact dating scheme.
A 2 means that the event occurred while someone present for the event was in direct psychic contact with Terra or the Sol system.
You would see it written as either 1492 or AD 1492 or 1492 CE.Today, Americans are used to a calendar with a "year" based the earth's rotation around the sun, with "months" having no relationship to the cycles of the moon and New Years Day falling on January 1.However, that system was not adopted in England and its colonies until 1752.In 1752, they all changed to the Gregorian calendar.In order to properly interpret dates prior to 1752, one must understand the difference between the Julian and Gregorian calendars.